Capital Gains Tax Losses and Connected Persons

Chris Stedman
Senior Partner
September 13, 2021
3 min read

Farmer Brown owns a piece of land which has suffered a genuine reduction in value in the five years of ownership. He bought it for approximately £1 million in the expectation that he could sell it on at a profit. He has not used it for any commercial purpose. Now two local valuers have valued it at only £700,000.

One of the farmer’s sons has come into some money and has offered to buy the land from his father for £700,000 which will crystallise a loss of £300,000. The idea is that the farmer will then be able to set this loss against future gains he expects to achieve on subsequent land disposals.

An excellent scheme - or is it?

Special rules apply where connected persons are involved:

  1. A transaction between connected persons is deemed to occur at market value. This is not a problem in this case because the proposed sale/purchase is at market value. However…
  2. A loss arising from such a transaction is not allowable against other gains unless the gain arises from a disposal to the same connected person. The farmer will have what are known as “clogged losses” which probably won’t help him.

Of course the situation would be different if the land had been acquired by the farmer as an item of trading stock or in the course of a property dealing/development trade. In that case a trading loss on sale to the son should not be restricted.

Another possibility would be for the farmer to sell the land to a non-connected person at market value and for this person to sell on to the son perhaps a few months or a year or so later. In theory this would work but such a scheme would involve extra stamp duty land tax and possibly other tax issues as well. HMRC could be expected to look closely at exactly what has happened, argue with some force that in essence a third party had been interposed as an agent or nominee and that in reality it was simply a disposal of land from father to son.

All very unfair, you might say, but tax is not always equitable, a fact lamented by senior members of our judiciary from time to time. The likelihood is that this area has already been exploited and once again the Government has had to plug the gap.

Do ensure you seek advice before transacting in land, C&H Stedman are ready and willing to help!

Subscribe to Steddi Updates

Get industry insights that you won't delete, straight to your inbox.
We use contact information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information, check out our Privacy Policy.

More news

Latest News

Making Tax Digital - Postponed

The government has just announced some important postponements in its efforts to fully digitalise and streamline the UK tax system. A parliamentary statement was presented to the House of Commons by Lucy Frazer, the new Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 23 September 2021. So what is on hold and for how long?

Read Article

Capital Gains Tax - A Garage Project

George & Mary bought their family home in 1996. It costs them £265,000. The property and the separate garage stand in a plot which is just within the “permitted area”. This is normally taken as 0.5 hectares which in broad terms corresponds to 1.235 acres. George & Mary have looked after the property and as it stands today it would probably fetch £1.4m. But George & Mary have other ideas...

Read Article

Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - Fraudulent and Erroneous Claims

Now that furlough has drawn to a close, businesses should brace for a significant flood of letters from HMRC as the government looks to recoup a suspected £7bn of fraudulent or erroneous coronavirus job retention scheme (CJRS) claims.

Read Article